Custom Query (332 matches)
Results (154 - 156 of 332)
Ticket | Resolution | Summary | Owner | Reporter |
---|---|---|---|---|
#292 | fixed | email2trac and Apache Bloodhound | bas | ian.wild@… |
Description |
Hi Bas, I'm looking after WANdisco's input to Apache Bloodhound, which is an ASF project based on Trac, aiming to improve the default packaging and provide an easier to use and more accessible defect tracker out of the box. You can find out more at http://incubator.apache.org/bloodhound/ (although it is still early days!) As part of the work we'd doing we are hoping to include some useful Trac plugins, pre-configured and ready to use out of the box. In the case of email2trac, we believe your tool provides essential functionality and are wondering if you would consider allowing this to be used as part of Bloodhound? We'd be happy to help maintain the tool going forwards and would also welcome any suggestions you have for ongoing collaboration. Obviously the GPL license of email2trac restricts us from including email2trac as it is today, so the first question would be whether this is something you and any other authors of email2trac be interested in talking about further, either by email or on a quick conference call? Best Wishes, Ian -- Ian Wild Director of Engineering WANdisco, Inc. Cell : +44 (0)7961193722 Office DDI: +44 (0)114 3030472 US: +1 925 3801734 http://www.wandisco.com uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy http://www.uberSVN.com <http://www.ubersvn.com/> Everything you need to deploy Subversion in the Enterprise http://www.wandisco.com/subversion<http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/multis ite> Subversion community http://www.svnforum.org |
|||
#340 | fixed | [patch] Incorrect method call causing exception in some cases | bas | ianyh |
Description |
There was a case where the lower method on a string was referenced as an object instead of actually making a method call. I've added a patch for it. |
|||
#197 | fixed | DiscussionPlugin support | bas | ibarton@… |
Description |
Hello, email2trac developers. I'm a developer of DiscussionPlugin for Trac [1] and one of its users requested an e-mail posting support for it [2]. I see that a good way to implement this would be to extend your email2trac set of scrips so I'm asking if would it be acceptable for you to include to mainstream possible patch that would add DiscussionPlugin support to email2trac or should I fork/reuse email2trac (or something else) in standalone solution or start to implement something from scratch? I haven't studied email2trac code much for now so I don't know how to do it exactly yet, but in case of possitive answer, I'd digg more into it. Anyway, any hints or advices would be appreciated. Thank you for making your stand on this topic. [1] - https://trac-hacks.org/wiki/DiscussionPlugin [2] - https://trac-hacks.org/ticket/6883 With best regards, |
Note: See TracQuery
for help on using queries.