Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
#242 closed task (fixed)
Identifying reporter sometime fails with bi-case email addresses
Reported by: | dmcr@… | Owned by: | bas |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | |
Component: | email2trac | Version: | trunk |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
Hi Bas,
I had a reporter who updated a ticket he had created; and since email2trac did not recognize him as the reporter, it started a new ticket (while using ticket_permission_system = update_restricted_to_participants).
It turned out to be due to the reporter sometimes using a bi-case email address, and email2trac not always using the lower() method to standardize the addresses.
The attached patch fixes this case, and other similar ones.
Best regards,
Dennis McRitchie?
Attachments (1)
Change History (11)
Changed 12 years ago by dmcr@…
comment:1 Changed 12 years ago by bas
- Status changed from new to assigned
- Version changed from 2.0.2 to trunk
Thanks will be applied
comment:2 Changed 12 years ago by bas
- Milestone set to New email2trac release 2.X.X
comment:3 Changed 12 years ago by bas
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from assigned to closed
comment:4 Changed 12 years ago by anonymous
fwiw, this should be an option, since it breaks RFC compliance for email.
'Fred@…' and 'fred@…' are allowed to be 2 different email addresses. (The original code only lowercases the hostname, which is explicitly not case sensitive in the RFCs: 'fred@…' and 'fred@…' ARE the same email address.)
Note: I'm not saying this new behavior shouldn't be the default, just that it'd be nice to be able to restore RFC compliance.
comment:5 Changed 12 years ago by dmcr@…
It's a good point. However, the RFC states that "exploiting the case sensitivity of mailbox local-parts impedes interoperability and is discouraged". It also states: "While the above definition for Local-part is relatively permissive, for maximum interoperability, a host that expects to receive mail SHOULD avoid defining mailboxes where the Local-part requires (or uses) the Quoted-string form or where the Local-part is case-sensitive."
In this case, the "host that expects to receive mail" is the email2trac server itself, and bas might simply document that the email2trac server defines the local part as case-insensitive (as do most mail servers).
Dennis
comment:6 Changed 12 years ago by bas
- Milestone New email2trac release 2.X.X deleted
- Resolution fixed deleted
- Status changed from closed to reopened
- Type changed from defect to enhancement
Thanks for all the info. Did not know that mail addresses could be case sensitive. I could make an option for it. But who uses case sensitive mail addresses?
comment:7 Changed 12 years ago by bas
- Priority changed from major to minor
comment:8 Changed 12 years ago by dmcr@…
No internet mail provider that I know of uses a case-sensitive local-part for their email addresses. It is simply impractical. It's a wonder to me that this concept was left in the RFC, but if anyone uses this "feature", it must be in intra-net applications. Since email2trac is used in internet applications, I would recommend that you simply, clearly document that, like other internet mail providers, the email2trac server does not support case-sensitive email addresses. If someone needs the case-sensitivity, you could then add an option to provide it.
Dennis
P.S. BTW, I don't think the way email2trac was coded before my patch fully supported the RFC either. The support for case-sensitivity was inconsistent as I recall.
comment:9 Changed 12 years ago by bas
- Type changed from enhancement to task
I will document it and it is true and never supported this RFC ;-)
comment:10 Changed 12 years ago by bas
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from reopened to closed
Lower-case all email addresses before comparing.